Preview

Real-World Data & Evidence

Advanced search

Aspects of pharmaceutical care for patients with cephalgia in specialized neurology clinics

https://doi.org/10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-066

EDN: XKRMFU

Abstract

Objective. To determine the characteristics of pharmaceutical care for patients with headache in specialized neurology clinics.

Materials and methods. Questionnaire survey of clinic patients with the integrated ID–Migraine test using a validated questionnaire (from August to October 2023 inclusive) by a continuous sampling method, statistical processing of the results. Descriptive statistics and parametric and nonparametric methods were used in the statistical processing. The initially established level of statistical significance was considered to be at least 95 % at p <0.05.

Results. The study was conducted until 100 completed questionnaires were received. There was a high prevalence of women (84.0 %), mostly older than 40 years (68.1 %, n=94), and the average age of patients was 49.4±1.5 years. Migraine as a cause of headache was stated by 21.0 % of patients, and 38.9 % of patients answered positively to two or more questions of the ID–Migraine test (n=98), which may indicate the presence of migraine. Self-medication is widespread among patients (78.0 %), with 71.0 % considering it necessary to consult a physician only in case of prolonged headache that does not go away with analgesics. 63.0 % consider pharmacy as a specialized organization and pharmacists as highly qualified specialists who can qualitatively advise customers on drugs and symptoms, but should not diagnose and should not replace a physician (100.0 %). Also, the majority (72.0 %) believe that no pharmacist should be able to diagnose the type of headache based on symptoms and recommend drugs accordingly. Among the most important factors (on a 3‑point scale) influencing drug choice, clinic patients mentioned proven efficacy and safety (2.45±0.09), and prescribing physician (2.45±0.09). This indicates high compliance and trust of the clinic patients in the physician. The results of the questionnaire revealed three «profiles » of patients, the basis of which being fundamentally different attitudes toward pharmacists, pharmacies and physicians: neutral (loyal to pharmacies and pharmacists), highly loyal (to pharmacies and pharmacists), and loyal to the physician.

Conclusion. Patients in clinics may be represented by different subgroups with specific characteristics, needs, preferences, and, accordingly, different strategies of pharmaceutical care. This highlights the need for an individualized approach to communication between the pharmacists and each patient, considering the specificity of their needs and expectations.

About the Authors

O. V. Reshetko
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovskiy
Russian Federation

Olga V. Reshetko — Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, Head of Department of Pharmacology

Saratov


Competing Interests:

The author declare no conflict of interest.



A. I. Grishin
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovskiy
Russian Federation

Anton I. Grishin — pharmacist

Saratov


Competing Interests:

The author declare no conflict of interest.



R. R. Parsamyan
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovskiy
Russian Federation

Ruzanna R. Parsamyan — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Neurology named after. K. N. Tretyakova, Senior Researcher at the Department of Basic Research in Neurocardiology, Research Institute of Cardiology; Head of Clinic Pain

Saratov


Competing Interests:

The author declare no conflict of interest.



E. A. Rakhmanova
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovskiy
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Rakhmanova — 6th year student of the Faculty of General Medicine

Saratov


Competing Interests:

The author declare no conflict of interest.



References

1. Tabeeva GR. Headaches in general medical practice. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2022;94(1):114-121. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.01.201325.

2. Lebedeva ER, Kobzeva NR, Gilev DV, Olesen E. Analysis of the quality of diagnosis and treatment of primary headache in different social groups of the Ural Region. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2015;7(1):19-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2015-1-19-26.

3. Dryomova NB, Korzhavyh EA, Litvinova TM. Pharmaceutic care: term and concept. Farmaciya 2005;2:37-45 (In Russ.)

4. Samuel S, Allemann JW, Foppe van Mil et al. Pharmaceutical Care: The PCNE Definition. Int J Clin Pharm 2014;36(3):544-55. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9933-x.

5. Reshetko O.V., Grishin A.I. Quality assessment of pharmaceutical care to patients with headaches using the simulated patient method: interaction practice. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2023;(2):4-13. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-2-4-13.

6. Medvedeva L.A., Zagorul’ko O.I., Shevtsova G.E. Analiz obrashhaemosti pacientov s golovny`mi bolyami k nevrologu kliniki boli. Russian Journal of Pain. 2016;50(2):137-138.(In Russ.)

7. Velizhanin V.V., Kerimkulova A.A., Lyapunova A.I. Assessment of the structure of patient appeals with tension headache and migraine. Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific forum with international participation “Youth Science Week - 2021”. 2021:210-211.

8. Medvedeva L.A., Zagorul’ko O.I., Shevtsova G.E. et al. Prevalence of headache among patients in a specialized pain clinic. Russian Journal of Pain. 2013;38(1): 25-26.(In Russ.)

9. Reshetko O.V., Grishin A.I. Quality assessment of pharmaceutical care to patients with headaches using the simulated patient method: drug recommendations and pharmaceutical counseling. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2023;(2):14-25. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-2-14-25.

10. Reshetko O.V., Grishin A.I. Pharmaceutical care for patients with headaches: pharmacists' statements and pharmacy practice. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2024;(2):105-116. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2024-2-104-115. EDN: EDVVIU.

11. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Zhovnerchuk E.V., Lebedev G.S., Panova I.V. Opportunities for using telemedicine in occupational pathology. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2020;60(10):634-639. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-10-634-639.

12. Slyusar O.I., Abuzarova M.R., Alekseev K.V et al. Ethical and deontological aspects of the pharmaceutical activity. The Journal of scientific articles “Health and Education Millennium”. 2017;19(12):297-301. (In Russ.)]

13. Sam Aaseer Thamby, Subramani Parasuraman. Seven-star pharmacist concept by World Health Organization. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2014;2(1):1-3. DOI:10.5530/jyp.2014.2.1.


Review

For citations:


Reshetko O.V., Grishin A.I., Parsamyan R.R., Rakhmanova E.A. Aspects of pharmaceutical care for patients with cephalgia in specialized neurology clinics. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2025;5(1):25-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-066. EDN: XKRMFU

Views: 205


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3784 (Online)