Particular qualities of evaluation of electronic card data in modern healthcare
https://doi.org/10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-060
EDN: YJFMTQ
Abstract
This article is devoted to the study and analysis of electronic health records (EHR), which are the main tool in the field of digital healthcare. EHR provide faster and more efficient transfer of medical information between various institutions and specialists, which contributes to improving the quality of medical care. The article discusses various aspects of the implementation and use of EHR, including technical difficulties, data privacy and security issues. Special attention is paid to the influence of EHR on the processes of diagnosis and treatment, as well as on the interaction between patients and medical professionals. Based on a review of current research and practical examples, the authors propose recommendations for optimizing the use of EHR in medical institutions. In conclusion, the prospects for further development of EHR technologies and their role in the transformation of modern medicine are discussed.
About the Authors
I. R. SvechkarevaRussian Federation
Izabella R. Svechkareva — Resident of the department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine
Saint Petersburg
A. A. Kurylev
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Kurylev — Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine
Saint Petersburg
D. E. Shilova
Russian Federation
Darya E. Shilova — 5th year student
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Gusev A.V., Zingerman B.V., Tyufilin D.S., Zinchenko V.V. Electronic medical records as a source of real-world clinical data. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2022;2(2):8-20. (In Russ.)].
2. Zingerman B.V., Shklovsky-Kordi N.E. Electronic medical record and principles of its organization. Doctor and information technology. 2013; (2):37-58. (In Russ.)].
3. GOST R ISO / TS 183082008 "Health informatization. Requirements for the architecture of electronic health records". https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200067414. (In Russ.)].
4. Assessing Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force Fleurence, Rachael L. et al. Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, 692 - 701
5. Polnaszek B, Gilmore-Bykovskyi A, Hovanes M, et al. Overcoming the Challenges of Unstructured Data in Multisite, Electronic Medical Record-based Abstraction. Med Care. 2016;54(10):e65-e72. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000108.
6. Hernandez-Boussard T, Monda KL, Crespo BC, & Riskin D. Real world evidence in cardiovascular medicine: ensuring data validity in electronic health record-based studies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Assocition: JAMIA. 2019;26(11):1189-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz119.
7. Mishkin I.A., Kontsevaya A.V., Gusev A.V., Drapkina O.M. Prediction of cardiovascular events using proportional risk models and machine learning models: a systematic review. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. 2023;2:804-829. (In Russ.)].
8. Griffith SD, Tucker M, Bowser B, Calkins G, Chang CJ, Guardino E, Khozin S, Kraut J, You P, Schrag D, Miksad RA. Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2122-2136. doi: 10.1007/s12325-01900970-1.
9. Fleurence RL, Kent S, Adamson B, Tcheng J, Balicer R, Ross JS, Haynes K, Muller P, Campbell J, Bouée-Benhamiche E, García Martí S, Ramsey S. Assessing Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force. Value Health. 2024 Jun;27(6):692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.019.
10. Huang SC, Pareek A, Seyyedi S, Banerjee I, Lungren MP. Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 16;3:136. doi: 10.1038/s41746020-00341-z.
11. Hersh WR, Totten AM, Eden KB, Devine B, Gorman P, Kassakian SZ, Woods SS, Daeges M, Pappas M, McDonagh MS. Outcomes From Health Information Exchange: Systematic Review and Future Research Needs. JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Dec 15;3(4):e39. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5215.
12. Evans RS. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016 May 20;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-61. doi: 10.15265/IYS2016-s006.
13. Reis ZSN, Maia TA, Marcolino MS, Becerra-Posada F, Novillo-Ortiz D, Ribeiro ALP. Is There Evidence of Cost Benefits of Electronic Medical Records, Standards, or Interoperability in Hospital Information Systems? Overview of Systematic Reviews. JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Aug 29;5(3):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7400.
14. Interoperability in Healthcare. HIMSS. [2022-0204]. https://www.himss.org/resources/interoperability-healthcare.
15. Begoyan A. An overview of interoperaiblity standards for electronic health records. Integrated Design and Process Technology. 2007. [2021-12-07]. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.131.4421&rep=rep1&type=pdf .
16. Studeny J, Coustasse A. Personal health records: is rapid adoption hindering interoperability? Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Jul 1;11(Summer):1e.
17. Thompson MP, Graetz I. Hospital adoption of interoperability functions. Healthc (Amst). 2019 Sep;7(3):100347. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.12.001.
18. Reisman M. EHRs: The Challenge of Making Electronic Data Usable and Interoperable. P T. 2017 Sep;42(9):572-575.
19. Glickman M, Orlova A. Building Interoperability Standards and Ensuring Patient Safety. J AHIMA. 2015 Nov-Dec;86(11):48-51.
20. Goals and benefits of data interoperability. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [202202-04]. https://www.cdc.gov/datainteroperability/goals-and-benefit.html .
21. Neves AL, Freise L, Laranjo L, Carter AW, Darzi A, Mayer E. Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1019-1032. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010581.
22. Six domains of health care quality. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [2022-02-03]. https://www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/measures/six-domains.html.
23. Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety - the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;153:23-46.
24. Ngugi P, Were MC, Babic A. Facilitators and Barriers of Electronic Medical Records Systems Implementation in Low Resource Settings: A Holistic View. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251: 187-190.
25. Lyles C, Schillinger D, Sarkar U. Connecting the Dots: Health Information Technology Expansion and Health Disparities. PLoS Med. 2015 Jul 14;12 (7):e1001852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001852.
26. Wilson K, Khansa L. Migrating to electronic health record systems: A comparative study between the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Policy. 2018 Nov;122(11):1232-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.013.
27. Clarke A, Watt I, Sheard L, Wright J, Adamson J. Implementing electronic records in NHS secondary care organizations in England: policy and progress since 1998. Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):95-106. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw055.
28. Gusev A.V., Vladzimirskii A.V., Golubev N.A., Zarubina T.V. Informatization of healthcare in the Russian Federation: history and results of development. National Health Care (Russia). 2021;2(3):5-17. (In Russ.)].
29. Электронный ресурс: [https://egisz.rosminzdrav.ru/#fourthPage] (дата обращения: 04.12.2024 г.).
Review
For citations:
Svechkareva I.R., Kurylev A.A., Shilova D.E. Particular qualities of evaluation of electronic card data in modern healthcare. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2024;4(4):28-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-060. EDN: YJFMTQ